Monday, February 7, 2011

Take Responsibility And Understand That Nads Are Not To Be Hoofed

For eight long years we sat and laughed at George W Bush and his mouth-born balls-ups, printing quotes on t-shirts and creating head-slapping compilations of his inadequacy on You Tube. In fact, Dubya creates more ‘memes’ during his tenure than any other single person I can think of.
Trey Parker and Matt Stone create a record-breaking animation show called ‘South Park’ that satirises some of the most ridiculous traits of the western world, and go on to write the song ‘Blame Canada’ as a scathing observation of the American blame-culture and foreign policy. It gets an Oscar nomination.
Paul Verhoeven directs Starship Troopers, a thinly-veiled celluloid middle-finger to the socio-political ethos of modern warfare.
Channel 4 tackles political and corporate corruption in the Dispatches documentary series. It becomes lauded as a groundbreaking, no-holds-barred current-affairs programme.
Before he became ‘uncool’ to the cultural idiot, Michael Moore brings Chomsky-style political and social narrative to the masses in any easy-to-digest-without-freaking-out format. Oscars are won.
Chuck Palahniuk writes Fight Club, a fictional ride through modern social and psychological breakdown. Dealing with the vacuousness of modern consumerism, it becomes a prominent and much-quoted feature of early-noughties culture.
Green Day release the concept album ‘American Idiot’, a rock-opera that chronicles one man’s struggle in corporate America. The album reaches #1 on billboard charts worldwide selling over 10 million copies.
Etcetera.

And not a single bit of it made a blind bit of difference. I can guarantee you that many of the people who watched Fight Club on DVD sat there with their feet up on a Swedish minimalist sofa during the reel, feeling indignant as the narrator sarcastically talks of Ikea’s ‘versatile solutions for modern living’, yet completely missing the irony of their current situation. They probably even hit McDonalds afterwards for a beef-flavoured sugar-rush. Without the beef flavour.

Amazingly, the general populace doesn’t have to sit through political lectures or read books about socio-economics to get a gist of what’s going on. It’s spoon-fed on a regular basis through subculture and entertainment. But the only effect it seems to have is one of providing quotes during social gatherings, so that one can feel ‘clever’ during pseudo-political discussions. To most, the state-of-the-world-address is now as pertinent to our society as an episode of Mock the Week, and usually holds less interest for us.

So, most people who converse about socio-politics are basically taking small bites of information to spit back out if necessary. At no point do they swallow. It seems that apathy rules when it comes to genuinely having a firm grasp on the application of ethics and morality – probably because most people know that if they allowed themselves to truly understand their situation, they’d have to have second thoughts about buying that personalised number-plate. And who wants to understand the terrible impact of pointless acquisition when the front of their Ford Focus could read ‘B16 DOG’?

But, if I’m honest, I know that it’s not completely our fault. We can only learn via our close environment, and our direct environment isn’t exactly open to free debate or the provision of truth. Our culture is one that talks of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ – two philosophies that have been completely redefined via complicated language and politics, until they’re no longer recognisable as their literal selves. Not that we’d know it of course. But that’s the point. Cake is only cake because our grandma and Delia Smith have told us as much. Democracy now means ‘being allowed to vote for someone from a public-school club who shouts a lot in a very expensive London-based building, whilst their mates wave pieces of paper at the opposition party and yell ‘wyeeeeaaarrrr’ a lot’. Our confusion is therefore understandable.

But our choice of ignorance isn’t...

...Because I know that we are smarter than this. We self-impose ignorance, because it means that we don’t have to take responsibility. And we get caught up in the same discussions, using the same clichés to make a point.

“Who do you vote for?”
“I don’t vote”
“What!? It’s your democratic responsibility to vote. Wars have been fought to protect your freedom to vote”
“Bollocks. Wars have been fought to maintain the status-quo of our economy and ruling class. Nothing else. It has sod-all to do with democracy, freedom or otherwise. If you are really interested in why wars have been fought for the last few hundred years, go read the plethora of books on the subject.”
“If you don’t vote, you don’t have the right to an opinion”
“That’s just being silly. It’s like this. Voting politically has an inherent flaw. Choosing between political parties is like asking me if I want a kick in the balls or a punch in the face. I refuse to vote for someone to do either.”
“There’s always a lesser of two evils”
“Maybe. But why choose evil at all? Isn’t that like saying that you’ll only rape someone when they sleep because it’ll be better for them?”
“So, what’s the alternative then smart-arse?”
“I don’t know. I’m not qualified to say. Give me time and I’ll educate myself enough to form an opinion. But right now, I just don’t want to give somebody the thumbs-up to kick me in the spuds”
“You liberals are all the same...”
“And you are hilarious. I’m as much a liberal as I am a Conservative. Can you only characterise people through standard, predefined political alliances? As far as I’m concerned, every ounce of the ‘set’ political and social spectrum is dog-balls. Left or right, hippy or elitist; If you live your life as any of these definitions, you are submitting yourself to ignorance to avoid the responsibility of thinking. Society evolves and is transient by nature. Therefore, as a free thinking human being, you should evolve and work within this transience.”
“If you don’t agree with the system, vote to change it”
“You have just made the most stupid statement you could possibly muster at this precise moment in time. If I voted, I would be taking part in a system that is corrupt in its entirety. It’d be like protesting against vivisection by punching an ox. I don’t want to have anything to do with the political system of this country. Politics in all forms is corrupt. Every last iota. It’s a system that allows a ruling class to create legislation to dictate to a subservient class. It’s simply a cleaner form of slavery. This, my friend, is a fact. I am not voting for slavery.”

At this point in the conversation, I’d expect the other person to stare blankly at me, scoff, then decide that it’d be much easier to go home and watch ‘A Question of Sport’ rather than give me or my views further consideration.
And for the record, I do go to the polling booth. But instead of ticking a box, I draw a big middle finger over the ballot sheet and artfully scrawl the words ‘no confidence’ or suchlike underneath. Spoiled votes are counted, meaning that my dissent is recorded alongside the usual conveyor of neat pencil-ticks. And I can guarantee that if enough people drew artful swearwords on their ballot-paper, the political world would start to sweat a bit. At the moment, the political stratus has no idea what goes on in the ‘real world’, and the ballot is the only bit of paper that guarantees to get your opinion through the doors of Downing Street. It’s the perfect solution for the non-apathetic non-voter, or citizen who feels like they don’t have choice.

Moving swiftly back to my point: Even if we weren’t to look further than popular entertainment, there is enough ‘education’ to at least help us understand the western socio-political climate to a half-decent degree. And anyone with even the thinnest sliver of conscience will see that we currently sit in the middle of a cultural balls-up. So we have absolutely NO excuse when the media glaringly inform us of global inequality, famine, death and destruction which we get piped to our televisions or slapped in the pages of newspapers on a daily basis. When all of the information we receive comes together, we should be motivated or at least shamed into actually standing up and making a point about it in a loud, clear voice. This is called integrity.

But then again, the car needs servicing and there’s a nice shirt in Burtons that needs to be purchased. The world can wait until later.

Dee.

11 comments:

  1. The following conversation has been posted from messages by the kind permission of the conversee:

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matt Brute:
    In one way I agree with you but in another way I look at other countries and think that we possibly have it less wrong!! At least we don't truly live in fear. The system works enough to keep us secure if not completely safe. Then of course there is the other argument that I've got a burtons store card and need some new hoodies so see ya later!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. ‎"At least we don't truly live in fear."
    Fear is the point of this system. Terrorism doesn't exist - not as the screaming islamic mad-fest we're meant to believe. Nor does swine-flu. Nor SARS. And gale-force winds don't REALLY cause 'chaos'.... This is Britiain. Its wet and windy here. As it has been for zillions of years. This country is the absolute definition of neurosis. The majority of contries that 'truly live in fear' - as you mentioned - live in fear of us, or as a direct result of western 'influence'. But the point of my spiel was to illustrate that there is a massive amount of information between the lines that is missed by 99% of people. And we accept the official line all to often. Tell me - if you had the ultimate choice as to how you live your life, would you work an 8 hour day to acquire money to pay bills? Or would you use your time to better yourself, to explore life and fulfil your existence? You'll answer by telling me that its 'better than it could be' etc. Whereas I'd argue that your reply is defeatest. The simple truth is that we shouldn't be living like this - there are options. We are an intelligent, innovative species and I refuse to settle for subservience.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Matt Brute:
    In my case I would do exactly what I am doing now but I am lucky and happen to have a job that interests me beyond anything else that I could be doing and I get to help people but if I am honest that is just a happy coincidence. I do it bec...ause human behaviour fascinates me. As for the whole "don't live in fear" thing you should consider that you live in a country where you are allowed to write whatever you like and publish it for all to see without people turning up in the middle of the night and taking you away. You can also choose to live with whichever woman or man (if that's your predilection) you choose without fear that your elected government will put you to death. If you become ill you will be cared for and if you commit a crime (even a little one) you will be treated fairly and not have your arms chopped off, stones thrown at you or an injection that will make you die. It is true that we don't have it right but I think it's not as bad as all that. If it was we wouldn't have thousands of people streaming into the country legally and illegally every day looking for a better life. As fir the spoiled vote thing you are right, they are counted but those figures do nothing and have no effect on the outcome of an election and ate usually paraded as proof that our education system is so poor as to fail to equip adults to tick a box by whoever loses! Making people who protest in that way just another statistic used by the very system those individuals are protesting against. Trust me when I say this.... You can't beat the system! Getting annoyed about it is like getting pissed of because Monday follows Sunday. It's understandable but truly truly pointless because it's never going to change. Oh and I got some drift king hoodies that make me look snazzy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Every point you make is based on cultural relativism. Your job wouldn't exist if our current system worked. Research into neurological disorders has proved that they are a sociological problem, not simply a genetic one. And I can't see you ...getting upset if the murderers, rapists etc you train people to deal with are drastically cut in number, just so you can do your job. As for human behaviour fascinating you, read papers and books by Prof Robert Sapolsky or Dr Gábor Máté - to of the leading exponents in behaviour. They'll give you incredible insight into human 'condition' and the social components of aggressive and psychotic behaviour.
    As for "you live in a country where you are allowed to write whatever you like and publish it for all to see without people turning up in the middle of the night and taking you away". Tell that to Julian Assange. I'm sure that if I were lucky enough to have my blogs read by enough people for them to make a noticable cultural change, it'd be a very different ball-game. The west has a long history of silencing political critics, they're just smarter about it than the ones we - through propaganda - hear of in the news. The 'problem' that the west has is that it bases the system around quiet manipulation, using words such as 'democracy' and 'freedom'. If it were overt in its criticism of free speach, the system would be clearly seen to be corrupted.
    Also, your point about illegal immigration is based on the same relativism. The only reason we get such a quantity of immigration is because of the global economic system. They aint here for the weather homeboy. I've experienced first-hand people looking to move to the UK from a sub-tropical paradise because they've seen a Reebok advert and are getting pissed off with having to work for £5 a week when they are smarter than 90% of the holidaying Brits they have to serve. And if you looked into global economy, you'd see how utterly ridiculous the monetary system is. We have WAY more than enough resources to give every single human being on the planet a very comfortable life, but this distribution and owndership of resources is tied up in an extremely unfair and bafflingly stupid political and economic structure. Spare a thought for the poor sods who risk their lives to get over here to earn more dosh to keep their children out of poverty.
    As for the voting. Yes, at the moment, I'm just a statistic. Much as every person who enters the polling booths is. But, if all of a sudden, a huge jump in the number of spolied votes started to appear, the media would pick up on it. People would talk. People would realise that a 'protest' vote could be another option. And if at the moment, I'm just a statistic... well, we have to start somewhere eh? I'd rather make a point in a small way and be able to say that I held onto my integrity, rather than 'give up' and believe that I can't beat a system that I don't believe in.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Matt Brute:
    As a small update first as we haven't caught up in a while. I don't just teach people, in mental health, control and restraint anymore. That was a few years ago and with some study and hard work I've moved on. I now spe...cialise in conflict management specifically services that deal with women. I am afraid to say that your theory about aggression being a product of social conditions is misleading at best and at worst totally wrong. Many things combine to create behaviours that we would consider challenging. Things ranging from learned behaviours to chemical and hormonal imbalances to diagnosed mental health disorders and learning disabilities. Though some of those behaviours are specifically challenging to particular cultural groups, anything that impacts negatively on an individual has the same effect no matter where you are from. A kick in the Tads still stings if you are from Barcelona!!! This however is possibly a debate for another time as it's a biggie.
    Moving on.
    Julian Assange is accused of rape!!! These charges didn't just appear out of nowhere because he posted some secrets online. These accusations were made before the wikileaks debacle. States and countries have secrets for a reason and to assume that we can operate in a global caring sharing way is quite frankly pie in the sky. This man did not do the world any favours in fact he put a great deal of people in danger. Why do you think he did this because it wasn't for noble peaceful reasons it was for sensation. Since we landed on this planet humans have shown the same behaviour patterns. these include an urge to spread and an urge to dominate. Have you ever heard the tale of the scorpion and the frog because it says it all here.

    I havnt read anything by the two people you mention but will do some reading and get back to you on that one.

    If you re-read my post I didn't comment solely on illegal immigrants as that is a separate issue but you demonstrate my point exactly in your own statement. People come here for a better life. Not all get it but many do. A paradise is only a paradise if it's working for you. When you were in these amazing places you were in a position of privilege. To many people these places are an unending hell on earth of heat and hard work and poverty. In that position tottenham becomes a mythical place of joy and celebration. I know this because I have worked with many many people that have told me this.

    As for the voting thing do you not see that what you are trying to do by spoiling your vote is actually working within the system that you hate and despise so much. A spoiled vote is still a vote and that's the system. True change can only come about from a refusal to accept the system in all it's forms. This means anarchy my idealistic friend. To refuse the system completely means to live outside it. In order to truly achieve this you have to cast aside accepted social conventions and do whatever you think is right. The problem then arises if your right and my right don't match up. Because one of us will then set the standard but killing the other one. Before long people fall in behind that person through fear and lo and behold you have a system to fight against once more and round and round it goes. Society as we know it in this country has developed a set of checks and balances to prevent that cycle occurring. This keeps us safe and this was my original point. Check out some of the African nations, some of the eastern block nations and the middle east over the last few decades for some prime examples of this. In fact check out the planes landing in Wooten Bassett at the moment to see what happens when you try to force change on even a small group of people that don't want it. This will happen regardless of how noble or, alternatively, financial your reason for engendering change.

    If history has taught us one thing my friend it is this.

    I am a scorpion... It's what I do.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Note: At ths point, I forwarded a link to a film called Zeitgeist: Moving forward, which contains interviews with some of the world's leading social scientists. It can be viewed here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w

    The following response came from Matt Brute:

    This is some really interesting stuff and as you say extremely ground breaking. What I can't understand is why I haven't come across a...ny of their work before. You can rest assured that I will be doing a CONSIDERABLE amount of reading about this and their stuff in the near future. I am actually about to start a Bsc (hons) in violence reduction and I think you may have just done me a MAJOR MAJOR favour so I owe you a pint!!!! (providing you promise not to become an alcoholic)!! As to how this relates to our current debate I am not quite sure yet and since I am enjoying the back and forth of it all I may still stick to my pre-conceived ideas to see who changes who's opinion. Remember though that this is for fun and the views expressed within any posts are not necessarily the views of the author!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. is this not slightly contradictory ? is writing this any different from producing something like fight club ? What of the people reading it ? are most any different from those with their feet on the ikea table ?

    you dismiss both left and right wing politics as corrupt, or putting you in some sort of pigeon whole but as much as you fight it humans need a type of economy, be it anarchist as you seam to push, which would mean the end of hospitals, medical research and so on. or to be fair, the above in a co ordinated national / international fashion.

    how would you trade goods ? can you farm or make textiles ? if no then you will need to come up with an economic plan. therefore you will become in a 'box' but it is impossible truth.

    the second step would be to organise. if you think all politics is corrupt then the Conservative party is probibly your best choice as that is their fundimental belief also.

    smaller parties have achieved far more in Wales then any million dollar films.

    so where from here ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The whole sentiment behind this blog is not to point score between 'right and left wing politics'. It's a depiction of how the economy has spiralled into a pathetic excuse for stability.
    Are the fundamentals of life to be involved in a society, regardless of whether or not it works towards development of our race? I don't think so.
    The truth is that this 'system' is corrupt and broken, it doesn't work and therefore we require something different. As much as we can pick and choose which elements work and which don't - we are stuck in a societal rut where there are more fat people than healthy, depressed children and prisons bursting at the seams - not to mention the astounding world debt and oppression so many countries face from their own 'elected' Government.
    You're right to say that some sort of structure is required for everyone – I agree, but this one is ludicrous to defend as it will fuck us all in the ass with a pound sign in the end (if it hasn't already) and our development as a human race is put on the back burner until this debt is eliminated by making us spend more, work for less money and taxing the balls off the people. Surely our structure should work towards the development of everyone to their full potential.
    Idealistic? Yes. But the flip side of that is acceptance of something that makes zero sense which is just as absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mill.. my answer (in two parts due to the size of it).

    "is this not slightly contradictory ? is writing this any different from producing something like fight club ? What of the people reading it ? are most any different from those with their feet on the ikea table ?"

    - Maybe this isn't any different from producing something like Fight Club. But using the same rationale, is protesting any different? Is petitioning any different? Is holding debate any different? I'm simply my opinion on the current paradigm, regardless of the results.

    "you dismiss both left and right wing politics as corrupt, or putting you in some sort of pigeon whole but as much as you fight it humans need a type of economy, be it anarchist as you seam to push, which would mean the end of hospitals, medical research and so on. or to be fair, the above in a co-ordinated national / international fashion."

    - Education is the key here. If you only think within the remit of the current socio-political remit, then yes, you are right. If you think outside of it, you start to see that there are completely different systems that could work better. Systems that actually work WITH a more 'natural' human progression. I don't for one second dismiss 'modern' research, education, healthcare or technology. in fact, I believe technology could be our saviour. We have the ability and resources to produce self-replicating, self-servicing machinery that leaves the vast majority of us to live free, fulfilling lives. We also have the means to use renewable, clean energy (geo-thermal, solar, wind, hydro etc as well as the future possibility of the hydrogen fuel-cell) to run an entire world successfully. The only thing that stops this progression is the mindset of the current WORLD politic, and the division of humanity through the politics of the segregated elite classes.

    "how would you trade goods ? can you farm or make textiles ? if no then you will need to come up with an economic plan. therefore you will become in a 'box' but it is impossible truth."

    - We wouldn't need to 'trade'. It's a logistical issue. That’s all. Again, if we have the scientific brilliance to create nuclear weapons and the logistical brilliance to fight incredibly complex wars, surely we have the ability to arrange logistics to find the most economic way to pool resources, grow food locally and manufacture for the 'needs' of people. We could automate a vast amount of this. I have no problem with 'globalisation' if it means that we actually make the world economy viable. The monetary system stops us from doing this, as the current rule-set of economy prohibits common-sense.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "the second step would be to organise. if you think all politics is corrupt then the Conservative party is probibly your best choice as that is their fundamental belief also."

    - Politics have BECOME inherently corrupt. The evolution of politics means that instead of 'the people' making the decisions which are implemented by civil servants, the governments themselves are now the rule makers, regardless of public opinion. And unfortunately, 'the people' no longer have the ability to make correct decisions do to 'opinion' becoming instilled and manufactured through political propaganda. Could you imagine a world run via current cultural opinion? That would scare the living shit outta me. Only this morning I've had an argument with someone who sat there shouting 'Kill Gaddafi'. When I asked why they said this, they simply stuttered and said 'Genocide'. They had no opinion on what happens after he's gone, nor the history of Gaddafi and his relationship to the west.
    As for suggesting I'm Conservative due to a single 'ideal'... Do I need to illustrate how daft this is? Would wearing a pair of Doc Martins make me a skinhead?

    I understand WHY you've made the points you have, as you are looking through socialist eyes. You're fighting for a specific system. Whereas possibly I'm not looking for a system that exists already. The system I hold out for puts humanity and social welfare / happiness first and everything else second. And current psycho-social research suggests that my 'vision' would be a plausible answer to human survival and happiness. But hey, I'm swimming against a tide of bricks. All I can do is write my opinion... or shut up.

    ReplyDelete